ARTIST STATEMENT

My paintings emerge from the accumulation of dialogues with more than 40,000 people.

For many years, I have engaged in profound conversations with individuals from diverse backgrounds, listening carefully to their experiences of hope, anxiety, loss, love, conflict, and life-changing decisions. Each encounter has become embedded within my body, forming an invisible archive of human experience.

I do not paint the stories of specific individuals. Instead, I transform the traces left within me through dialogue into painting. My work is not a representation of personal narratives, but a translation of accumulated human encounters into visual form.

Rather than using brushes, I paint directly with my hands. Through this physical process, the memories of countless conversations become abstract fields of color and bodily gestures. These surfaces carry the movements, silences, emotional tensions, and unspoken moments that arise whenever one human being truly faces another.

My practice is grounded in the Japanese philosophy of wabi-sabi, embracing imperfection, impermanence, and the beauty of what remains unresolved. From this perspective, I seek not to portray individual identities, but to visualize society itself as it is formed through the overlapping experiences of many lives.

I call this practice The Abstraction of Society.

In this body of work, dialogue accumulates within the body, and its traces are transformed into painting. Rather than abstracting the psychology or inner world of a single individual, I propose a new form of abstraction—one that emerges from more than 40,000 human dialogues and attempts to abstract society itself.

Each painting functions as both an archive of human encounters and a space where viewers may discover echoes of their own experiences. My work invites us to reconsider how invisible relationships, shared emotions, and collective memory shape the society we inhabit.

Art Concept

My paintings attempt to remain in a state prior to resolution or harmony. Within them exist anxiety, despair, conflict, fluctuation, and a breath that has not yet disappeared. I do not depict these elements as resolved; rather, I seek to hold them on the surface as conditions that continue to exist while still being carried.

In my recent practice, the notion of “incompleteness” has become increasingly central. However, this does not mean something unfinished or abandoned midway. Instead, it is a method of consciously sustaining the moment in which a painting is pressured to close into a stable conclusion—yet resists fully doing so. It is about not resolving completely, not stabilizing entirely, and deliberately holding that tension.

What I aim for is not the presentation of a completed order. Collisions of color, overlapping traces, interruptions of movement, imbalances of density, and remaining spaces—these heterogeneous elements are not organized into a single answer but continue to coexist within the same surface. In this, I see something close to the way human beings live in reality. We do not resolve all wounds or fractures before continuing to live; more often, we move forward in time while still carrying them. For me, painting is a space to re-encounter such unresolved states—not as negation, but as affirmation.

In this sense, “incompleteness” is not merely an impression in my work but is becoming a structural decision that allows the painting to exist. How far to proceed, where to stop, what to leave unresolved, which conflicts to retain, and which spaces to preserve as breath—through these choices, I explore the possibility of a painting that is constituted by not closing.

In my current practice, I am deepening this “affirmation of incompleteness” as a serial body of work. While each piece differs in color, structure, temporality, and emotional density, the central question remains consistent: how can a painting come into being while still holding what cannot be resolved? For me, affirmation does not simply indicate brightness or redemption. It appears as the persistence of what does not collapse, as the survival of breath, as the presence of openings within excess, and as the acceptance of existence without erasing its wounds.

My paintings are not intended to present a single, completed world. Rather, they attempt to create a space in which multiple emotions, multiple temporalities, and multiple traces coexist without fully closing. This incompleteness is not a lack, but a form for remaining open—and within it, I find the urgency that painting can still hold today.

Critical Commentary

Hiroko Saigusa’s paintings originate from a fundamentally different point than conventional abstract art.
Their foundation lies in her long-standing practice as a psychic, engaging in dialogue with others.

Having encountered more than 40,000 individuals, her work has been rooted in deeply human experiences—love, family, work, illness, and life choices.
These dialogues are accumulated within the artist’s body and eventually emerge as physical movement within the act of painting.

Saigusa’s works do not depict specific people or narratives.
However, the canvas bears traces of emotions and tensions hope, uncertainty, and intensity absorbed through years of dialogue, appearing through gestures and flows of color.

In this respect, her paintings are not expressions of a personal inner world.
Rather, they can be understood as abstract manifestations of human experiences formed through dialogue.

While no figures are represented, multiple fragments of lives overlap within the surface.
Saegusa’s work can thus be read as an emotional landscape of society an accumulation of anonymous human experiences.